Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Solid value at €416.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
