Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa BG 8000X
