Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Exsence, C 3000 MHGA, left and right hand, Saltwater Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, EXSC3000MHGA
Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €416.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C, 8000 PG, left and right hand, Saltwater Fishing Reel, Front Drag, TPSW8000PGC
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €429.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size8000 PG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/230

Conclusion

Both Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX offers a ergonomics of 6.4 out of 10, while Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?

There are not much differences between the two comparables