Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
