Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano FX 1000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (7.49 out of 10). While Shimano FX 1000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
