Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano FX 1000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Shimano FX 1000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
