Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Shimano FX 1000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano FX 1000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Aero C3000X
