Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano FX 1000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Shimano FX 1000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.5 out of 10 (225g / 7,94oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
