Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
48.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Shimano FX 2500 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and ball bearings (8). While Shimano FX 2500 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)?
Shimano FX 2500 FCX
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX
