Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Shimano FX

Spinning

48.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Delphin SHARX

Spinning

54.70 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.09 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight273g / 9.63oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €69.95
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Conclusion

Delphin SHARX 4000X clearly outshines Shimano FX 2500 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (7 out of 10) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Shimano FX 2500 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Delphin SHARX 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano FX and Delphin SHARX?

Shimano FX 2500 FCX

Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers