Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX

Shimano FX
Spinning
48.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
71.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight675g / 23.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/350
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX clearly outshines Shimano FX 2500 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch). While Shimano FX 2500 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Shimano 19 Stella?
Shimano FX 2500 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X
