Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag

Shimano FX , 2500 FC, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, FX2500FC
Shimano FX
Spinning
48.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €18.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 FC
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
57.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.79 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.51 lbs
Weight345 g - 12.17oz
Line retireve per crank92 cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4 Shielded Stainless Steel

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €109.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000 S
  • Handle typeDouble handle
  • Drag typeRead drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-240 / 0,20-220 / 0,25-140 / 0,30-100 lb/yds: 6-180 / 8-120 / 10-100

Conclusion

Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag clearly outshines Shimano FX 2500 FCX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (92 cm / 36.22 inch) and gear ratio (6.0:1). While Shimano FX 2500 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano FX and Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag?

There are not much differences between the two comparables