Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin RAYA body
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Delphin RAYA body
Feeder And Match
44.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.63 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight584g / 20.6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size55 Y
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/400
Conclusion
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX clearly outshines Delphin RAYA body, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Delphin RAYA body may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Delphin RAYA body?
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
