Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and ball bearings (3+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
