Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and ball bearings (3+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
