Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
