Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX

Spinning

62.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 HG FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Stradic SWB

Seafishing

90.10 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.82 out of 10

Ergonomics5.44 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag16kg / 35.27lbs

Weight670g / 23.63oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €245.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size8000PG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/275

Conclusion

Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX clearly outshines Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.82 out of 10) and total score (9.01 out of 10). While Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.