Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Shimano FX

Spinning

52.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Abu GARCIA Zenon

Spinning

86.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.54 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight138g / 4.87oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandABU GARCIA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €326.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100

Conclusion

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Shimano FX 3000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Shimano FX 3000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano FX and Abu GARCIA Zenon?

Shimano FX 3000 FCX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues