Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX

Shimano FX, 3000 FC, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, FXC3000FC
Shimano FX
Spinning
52.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €18.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000 FC
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Daiwa 22 Exist LT, 3000D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-300
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €673.66
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Shimano FX 3000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano FX 3000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano FX 3000 FCX

  • The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.