Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
52.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 3000 FCX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano FX 3000 FCX offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano FX 3000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
