Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
52.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Shimano FX 3000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.73 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Shimano FX 3000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano FX 3000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
