Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX

Spinning

52.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Stradic SWB

Seafishing

63.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.73 out of 10

Ergonomics5.76 out of 10

Gear ratio5.7:1

Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs

Weight450g / 15.87oz

Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €219.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Conclusion

Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX edges out Shimano FX 3000 FCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.73 out of 10) and the ball bearings (7). Still, Shimano FX 3000 FCX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.0:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 71 centimeter / 27.95 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano FX and Shimano Stradic SWB?

Shimano FX 3000 FCX

Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles