Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX

Spinning

52.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000 FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Tiagra

Multireels

89.30 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.4 out of 10

Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1

Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs

Weight4935g / 174.08oz

Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €1,099.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size130A
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeLever drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Shimano Tiagra 130AX clearly outshines Shimano FX 3000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). While Shimano FX 3000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 130AX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano FX and Shimano Tiagra?

Shimano FX 3000 FCX

Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.