Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (138g / 4,87oz). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.08 out of 10 (138g / 4,87oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
