Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (143g / 5,04oz). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.05 out of 10 (143g / 5,04oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
