Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G)
Seafishing
85.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.45 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight665g / 23.46oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €778.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (665g / 23,46oz). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G)?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX
- Scoring 8.1 out of 10 (665g / 23,46oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
