Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (150g / 5,29oz). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
