Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (5.99 out of 10). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX
