Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX

Spinning

49.90 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight320g / 11.29oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn Squall II Conventional

Multireels

55.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.51 out of 10

Ergonomics5.93 out of 10

Gear ratio6:1:1

Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs

Weight520g / 18.34oz

Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €154.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size25N
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Conclusion

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (520g / 18,34oz) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano FX and Penn Squall II Conventional?

Shimano FX 4000 FCX

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt