Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX

Spinning

49.90 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight320g / 11.29oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €18.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 FC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A

Multireels

79.60 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.89 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio3.1:1

Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs

Weight1520g / 53.62oz

Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €849.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size9000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Conclusion

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano FX 4000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.89 out of 10) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Shimano FX 4000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano FX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?

Shimano FX 4000 FCX

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers