Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 4000 FCX and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano FX 4000 FCX offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Delphin INKS 4000X
