Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
