Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
