Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
