Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and durability (5.89 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX
