Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX stands out for a weight of 165g / 5,82oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.9 out of 10 (165g / 5,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
