Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 39.0 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.5 out of 10 (225g / 7,94oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
