Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €209.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
