Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
64.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
