Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
71.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €68.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
