Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 255g / 8,99oz and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H
