Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the weight (265g / 9,35oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a durability of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.49 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
