Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the weight (305g / 10,76oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a durability of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.26 out of 10 (305g / 10,76oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
