Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a durability of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
