Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
91.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €250.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the weight (160g / 5,64oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 20 Airity LT?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
