Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 235g / 8,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- The 5 out of 10 (4.8:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
