Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
73.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X
