Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
64.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €68.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 205g / 7,23oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 20 Legalis LT?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
