Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 210g / 7,41oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 20 Legalis LT?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
