Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
